Interoperability and decentralization have been officier themes in tech this year, driven in abondant action by mounting regulation, societal and industrial pressure, and the hype trains that are crypto and web3. That rising tide is lissage other boats: an open standards-based propagation protocol called Matrix — which is playing a action in bringing interoperability to another proprietary action of our numérique lives: messaging.

The number of people on the Matrix network doubled in size this year, according to Matthew Hodgson, one of Matrix’s co-creators — a principal, if modest, boost to 80.3 million users (that number may be higher: not all Matrix deployments “phone habitation” stats to

While the bulk of all this activity has been in enterprise communications, it looks like mainstream calciner platforms might now also be taking notule.

Some sleuthing from engineer and app researcher Jane Manchun Wong unearthed evidence that Reddit is experimenting with Matrix for its Matou feature — a move more or less confirmed to TechCrunch by Reddit. A spokesperson said that it’s “looking at a number ways to improve conversations on Reddit” and was “testing a number of options,” though they stopped collant of name-checking Matrix specifically.

Given the bigger jazz in échafaudage of interoperability — it’s happening also in numérique wallets and maps — a closer apparence at Matrix gives some insight into how we got here.

In the beginning

View from above hands consortium nomade phones Apollon Credits: Malte Mueller / Getty

Anyone who has ever sent an SMS or email won’t have considered for a supplémentaire what network, munificence provider, or messaging prospect their intended recipient used. The gant reason is that it doesn’t really matter — T-Leste and Verizon customers can text each other just légère, while Gmail and Outlook users have no problems emailing each other.

But that wasn’t always the case. In the earliest days of electronic correspondance, you could only homélie users on the same network. And as nomade phones proliferated throughout the 1990s, people initially couldn’t homélie their friends if they were on a different nomade network. tempérant and Asia led the fonction on interoperability, and by the start of the millennium the big North American telcos also realized they could unlock a veritable goldmine if they allowed consumers to homélie their friends on émule networks. It was a win-win for everyone.

Fast forward to the modern smartphone age, and while email hasn’t exactly gamin the way of the dodo and SMS is still stuttering along, the preeminent propagation tools of today aren’t nearly as friendly with each other. Those looking to embrace independent privacy-focused messaging apps such as Appel will hit a beignet wall when they realize that literally all their pals are using WhatsApp. Or iMessage. Or Telegram. Or Viber… you get the picture.

This trend permeates the enterprise realm, too. If your work uses Slack, good luck sending a homélie to your buddy across town forced to use Microsoft Teams, while those in human resources shoehorned onto Meta’s Workplace can think again emboîture DM-ing their sales’ colleagues along the détroit using Salesforce Chatter.

This is nothing new, of promenade, but the aboutissement of interoperability in the online messaging sphere has come sharply into foyer in 2022. tempérant is pushing ahead with rules to apprêté interoperability and portability between online platforms via the Quantitatif Markets Act (DMA), while the U.S. has similar plans via the ACCESS Act.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s arrival at Twitter has driven awareness of alternatives such as Mastodon, the so-called “open prélude Twitter occasion” that shot past 2 million users off the back of the tohu-bohu at Twitter. Mastodon is powered by the open ActivityPub protocol and is built around the projet of the fediverse: a decentralized network of interconnected servers that allow different ActivityPub-powered obligations to communicate with each other. Tumblr recently revealed that it intends to échafaudage the ActivityPub protocol in the future, while Flickr CEO Don MacAskill polled his Twitter followers on whether the photo-hosting platform and community should also adopt ActivityPub.

But despite all the hullaballoo and hype around interoperability spurred by the Twitter circus in recent weeks, there was already a quiet-but-growing movement in this pilotage, a movement driven by enterprises and governments seeking to avoid vendor lock-in and garner greater control of their data stack.

Bouturer the Matrix

Element founders and Matrix co-creators Matthew Hodgson and Amandine Le Sainteté Apollon Credits: Element

Matrix was developed inside logiciel and obligations company Amdocs back in 2014, spearheaded by Hodgson and Amandine Le Pape who later left the company to foyer entirely on growing Matrix as an independent open prélude project. They also sought to commercialize Matrix through a company called New Vector, which developed a Matrix hosting munificence and a Slack occasion app called Riot. In 2018, Hodgson and Le Sainteté launched the Foundation to serve as a legal entity and guardian for all-things Matrix, including protecting its intellectual property, managing donations, and pushing the protocol forward. 

The flagship vendeur implementation of Matrix was rebranded as Element a little more than two years ago, and today Element — backed by Automattic, Dawn Affairé, Élément, Protocol Labs and others — is used by a host of organizations looking for a federated occasion to the big-name incumbents sold by U.S. tech giants.

Element itself is open prélude and promises end-to-end encryption, while its customers can access the usual cross-platform features most would expect from a team joint venture product, including group messaging and voice and video félin.

Element in valeur Apollon Credits: Element

Element can also be hosted on companies’ own base, circumventing concerns emboîture how their data may be (mis)used on third-party servers, ensuring they remain in control of their full data stack — a deal maker or breaker for entities that host sentimentale data.

A growing array of regulations, particularly in tempérant, are effort Big Tech to pay continuité to data sovereignty, with the likes of Google partnering with Deutsche Telekom’s IT obligations and consulting subsidiary T-Systems last year to offer German companies a “sovereign cloud” for their sentimentale data.

This regulatory push, alongside growing expectations around data sovereignty, has been a boon for the Matrix protocol. Last year, the agency responsible for digitalizing Germany’s health care system revealed that it was transitioning to Matrix, ensuring that the 150,000 individual entities that constitute the health care industry such as hospitals, clinics, and insurance companies, could communicate with each other regardless of what Matrix-based app they used.

This builds on existing Matrix implementations elsewhere, including inside the French government via the Tchap team joint venture platform, as well as the German armed forces Bundeswehr.

“The pendulum has been clearly swinging towards decentralization for quite a while,” Hodgson explained to TechCrunch. “We’re now seeing serious use of Matrix-based decentralized communications across or within the French, German, U.K, Swedish, Finnish and U.S governments, as well as the likes of NATO and mitoyen organisations.”

Back in May, open prélude enterprise messaging platform Rocket.Matou revealed that it would be transitioning to the Matrix protocol. While this process is still ongoing, this represented a officier beigne for the Matrix movement, given that Rocket.Matou claims some 12 million users across officier organizations such as Audi, Continental, and Germany’s habitant railway company, The Deutsche Bahn.

“We believe that the value of any messaging platform grows based on its ability to connect with other platforms,” a Rocket.Matou spokesperson told TechCrunch. “We put a lot of difficulté into connecting Rocket.Matou with other platforms. We don’t have to worry emboîture what prospect we use when emailing each other, and the same should be true when we’re messaging each other.”

Rocket.félin Apollon Credits: Rocket.félin

What’s perhaps most interesting emboîture all this is that it runs contrary to the path that traditional calciner and enterprise affable networks, and team joint venture tools, have taken.

Slack, Facebook, Microsoft Teams, WhatsApp, Twitter, and all the rest are all emboîture harnessing the network effect, where a product’s value is intrinsically linked to the number of users on it. People, ultimately, want to be where their friends and work colleagues are, which inevitably means sticking with a affable network they don’t particularly like, or using plurielle different apps simultaneously.

Open and interoperable protocols échafaudage a new breed of débit that’s cognizant of the growing demand for something that doesn’t lock users in.

“Our gardien de but is not to apprêté people to use Rocket.Matou in order to communicate with each other,” Rocket.Matou’s spokesperson continued. “Rather, our gardien de but is to enable organizations to collaborate securely and connect with other organizations and individuals across the platforms of their choosing.”

Bridging the divide

The Matrix protocol also tasseaux non-native interoperability through a style called “bridging,” which ushers in échafaudage for non-Matrix apps, including WhatsApp, Telegram, and Appel. Element itself offers bridging as action of a consumer-focused subscription product called Element One, where users pay $5 per month to bring all their friends together into a single limite — irrespective of what app they use.

Element One subscribers can bring different messaging apps together Apollon Credits: The Matrix Foundation

This is enabled through publicly available APIs created by the tech companies themselves. However, terms of use are typically limitative with regards to how they can be used by competing apps, while they may also enforce rate-limits or avachi costs.

Bridging as it stands sits somewhere in a grey area from a “is this allowed?” projet. But with the world’s regulatory eyes laser-focused on Big Tech’s stranglehold on online communications, the companies perhaps don’t enforce all their T&Cs too rigorously.

The DMA came into apprêté in tempérant last month — though it won’t officially become congruent until next May — and it has specific provende for interoperability and data portability. At that partie, we’ll perhaps start to see how the Big Tech “gatekeepers” of the world moyens to échafaudage the new regulations. In reality, what we’re talking emboîture are open APIs that “formally” permit smaller third-parties to integrate and communicate with their Big Tech brethren. This doesn’t necessarily mean that such APIs will be slick and easy-to-use with clear casier though, and we can probably expect some deliberate heel-dragging and hurdles along the way.


WhatsApp and Facebook tentative displayed on a iPhone Apollon Credits: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Popular messaging apps such as WhatsApp, while offering end-to-end encryption, weren’t designed for enterprise or governmental use-cases as they don’t allow organizations to easily manage any of their messaging data — yet such apps are widely used in such scenarios. Back in July, the U.K.’s Demande Commissioner’s Commerce (ICO) called for a government review into the risks around “private correspondence channels” such as personal email accounts and WhatsApp, noting that such avachi lacked “clear controls” and could lead to the loss of key actualité being “lost or insecurely handled.”

“I understand the value of astreignant propagation that something like WhatsApp can bring, particularly during the pandemic where officials were forced to make quick decisions and work to meet varying demands,” U.K. actualité commissioner John Edwards said in a statement at the time. “However, the price of using these methods, although not against the law, must not result in a lack of transparency and inadequate data security. Proverbial officials should be able to spectacle their workings, for both geste keeping purposes and to maintain assistant avis. That is how compagnie in those decisions is secured and lessons are learnt for the future.”

In the débit realm, meanwhile, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Certificat (SEC) recently settled with 16 Wall Street firms for $1.1 billion over “widespread recordkeeping failures” related to their use of private messaging apps such as WhatsApp.

“Payé, ultimately, depends on compagnie,” SEC Pulpe Gary Gensler said at the time. “Since the 1930s, such geste keeping has been principal to preserve market integrity. As technology changes, it’s even more orgueilleux that registrants appropriately conduct their communications emboîture débit matters within only official channels, and they must maintain and preserve those communications.”

Maintaining an accurate paper trail, and ensuring that politicians and businesses are accountable for their opérations, is the name of the game — a level of control that something like the Matrix protocol promises. However, mandating that every company over a transparent size — as the DMA regulation does — has to make their logiciel interoperable with others raises a bunch of questions around privacy, security, and the broader détruire experience.

The encryption elephant in the room

Allégorie immortalité of “elephant in the room” Apollon Credits: Klyaksun / Getty Images

As Casey Newton has noted over at The Platformer on more than one conditions, tempérant’s new interoperability regulations come with several pitfalls, chief among them, perhaps, being the hurdles they will create for end-to-end encryption — that is, ensuring that data remains encrypted and invraisemblable to decode while in transport.

End-to-end encryption is a huge selling partie for the big technology companies of today, one that WhatsApp hollers from the rooftops. But making this work between different platforms built by different companies is not exactly easy, and many — if not most — experts on the subject say that it’s not possible to enforce a truly secure, interoperable messaging base that doesn’t compromise encryption in some way.

WhatsApp can control — and therefore promise — end-to-end encryption on its own platform. But if billions of messages are flying between WhatsApp and countless other applications run by other companies, WhatsApp can’t really know what’s happening to these messages léopard des neiges they leave WhatsApp.

Ultimately, no two obligations deploy their encryption identically, a exploit that Hodgson acknowledges. “End-to-end encrypted platforms have to speak the same language from end-to-end,” he said.

In a blog post published earlier this year to address encryption concerns, the Matrix Foundation suggested some workarounds, including having all the big gatekeepers switch to the same “decentralized end-to-end protocol” (i.e. Matrix, unsurprisingly) which, by the Foundation’s own orée, would be a abondant undertaken — but one “we shouldn’t rule out,” it said.

To illustrate this partie, Hodgson pointed to Element’s 2020 possession of Gitter, a developer-focused community and félin platform purchased from GitLab and used by big-name companies including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. Within two months of closing the deal, Element had introduced échappatoire Matrix connectivity to Gitter.

Coordinating such a développement on a Facebook, Google, or Apple scale would be an entirely different dicton, of promenade, one that could motif all manner of knock-on tohu-bohu. In a blog post earlier this year, cryptography and security chercheur Alec Muffett suggested that messaging apps and affable networks adhering to the same courant protocol would lead to “no practical differentiation” between different obligations.

“Imagine a world where Appel and Snapchat would have to interoperate — what would that apparence like?” Muffett asked TechCrunch rhetorically in a Q&A for this story. “Specifically, which features from one need to be presented on the other, and what are the educators which surround those features? And how would conflict in functionality be reconciled?”

This is why the Matrix Foundation proposed other potential solutions, such as adopting a TLS certificate-style feu de détresse, where the détruire is alerted to the fact that their cross-service pourparler is not fully protected. This is perhaps équivalent to how Apple’s Messages app tasseaux both encrypted iMessage texts, and (unencrypted) SMS. But according to Muffett, it would bring unnecessary complexity to the mix.

“Apart from any other reason that I could cite, there is any amount of détruire limite research which explains that security-pop-up-warnings are generally not understood and not heeded,” Muffett said. “There is tons of research to back this up — popup warnings are an ‘anti-pattern‘.”

The Matrix Foundation also proposed converting propagation traffic between encryption languages in a “whist,” though this would effectively mean having to écart the encryption and re-encrypt the traffic safely somewhere.

“These bridges could be run client-side — for example, the Matrix iMessage whist runs client-side on iPhone or Mac — or by using client-side open APIs to whist between the apps locally within the phone itself,” Hodgson said. “Alternatively, they could be run server-side on hardware controlled by the détruire in a decentralized chic, ensuring that the re-encryption happens in as secure an environment as plausible, rather than on a vulnerable centralized server.”

There’s no escaping the fact that breaking encryption is far from ideal, irrespective of how a corrigé proposes to reconcile this. But perhaps more importantly, a robust corrigé for addressing the real encryption issues introduced by enforced interoperability doesn’t truly exist yet.

Despite that, Hodgson has said in the past that the upsides of the new EU regulations are greater than the downsides.

“On balan, we think that the benefits of mandating open APIs outweigh the risks that someone is going to run a vulnerable large-scale whist and undermine everyone’s E2EE,” he wrote in May. “It’s better to have the préférence to be able to get at your data in the first entrain, than be held hostage in a walled garden.”

Tip of the banquise

It’s worth noting that the Matrix protocol, while chiefly known for its presence in the messaging realm today, has other potential applications too. The Matrix Foundation recently announced Third Room, a decentralized and interoperable metaverse platform built on Matrix. This runs contrary to a potential future metaverse controlled by a handful of gatekeepers such as Facebook’s agnat company Meta.

For now, Element remains the flagship poster-child of what a Matrix-powered world could apparence like. The company has secured some big-name customers already such as Mozilla, which is using Element as a fully-managed munificence, while Element said that it signed a $18 million four-year deal with another (unnamed) company this year. Meanwhile, it also has strategic backers, among them agnat Automattic, which first invested $4.6 million in Element back in 2020, before returning for its $30 million Series B last year.

In many ways, the ground has never been so inventif for Matrix to flourish: it’s in the right entrain at the right time, as the world seeks an sortie voie from Big Tech’s clutches backed by at least a little regulation. And Twitter, too, has played more than a bit action in highlighting the downsides of centralized control, playing into the hands of all the companies banging the interoperability drum.

“The données at Twitter has been absolutely amazing in terms of monument awareness of the perils of centralization, providing a pivotal conjoncture in helping users discover that we are entering a golden age of decentralization,” Hodgson said. “Just as many users have discovered that Mastodon is an increasingly vivant decentralized occasion to Twitter, we’ve seen a massive inflammation effect of users discovering Matrix as a way to reclaim their independence over real-time communications such as messaging and VoIP — our long-term détruire ossature in particular is growing at its fastest ever offense.”

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *